|
History
Below, is an excellent source
of research material:
http://essexmuseum.org/archives.htm
_____________________________________________________
Below, double click to enlarge
Marigold Plantation 1675, Thomas Bowler
James Bowler Will
Information on Marigold Owners over years
The above information is courtesy of Ellen Huppert, one of the
owners.
___________________________________________________________________
From the research of Ellen Huppert
Below, double click for map showing location
to 1687 Lower Piscataway Church

Source:



+_______________________________________________________________
Organized:
-
History
of Lower Farnham Church (Marigold)
-
-
Joseph Sawin Ewing, Papers, 1794-1965 (bulk 1950-1965) -
[focused upon Essex County]
-
-
Meriwether Smith
MINISTERS
FAMILIES
OF VIRGINIA.
By
BISHOP
MEADE.
IN TWO
VOLUMES.
VOL. I.
Philadelphia:
J. B. LIPPINCOTT COMPANY.
1891.

ARTICLE
XXXV.
Parishes in Essex County.—No. 1. South
Farnham.
This
parish was erected in 1692. It was called South
Farnham to
distinguish it from one in Richmond county, on the north side of the
Rappahannock, called North
Farnham.
There
were two churches in this
parish, called Upper and
Lower Piscataway.
The first minister of the
parish of whom we have any account was the Rev. Lewis
Latane, a Huguenot, who came to this country and settled in this
parish in the year 1700. He must have taken charge of the
parish very soon after his arrival, as a letter from
Governor Spottswood to the vestry of South
Farnham—found among his papers, and bearing date 17th
December, 1716—speaks of Mr. Latane as having been the minister of the
parish for nearly
sixteen years. This letter is in relation to an attempt on the part of
the vestry to displace Mr. Latane, and severely reprehends their
conduct, and threatens to interpose the authority of the Governor if
persisted in. It must have been abandoned, as appears from the journal
of a Mr. John Fontaine, who, travelling from Williamsburg through this
region of country, heard Mr. Latane preach at the
parish church, as he called it, in 1717, and speaks of his
sermon and himself in high terms of commendation. This was the year
after the date of the letter referred to. Mr. Latane seems to have been
a quiet man, moving on in the even tenor of his way, but feeling keenly
the injustice done him by his vestry. The opposition to him was not on
the ground of immorality or ministerial unfaithfulness or inefficiency,
but on account of his dialect, to which Mr. Latane thought they ought
now to have become accustomed. He felt aggrieved that, after preaching
for them so many years, the objection should be made at so late a day.
An anecdote connected with this matter is related of him, which seems to
be characteristic of the man. He was riding with one of his
parishioners, when the subject of his removal was talked over by them.
The other expressed his sorrow, but thought it better on the ground that
Mr. Latane's sermons were rendered unintelligible by his foreign brogue.
Before separating they came to the minister's gate. " Go by," he said,
"and get something to drink;" which was readily agreed to. This he said
to prove him. " Now," said the minister, " you can readily understand me
when I tempt you to do wrong, but you can't understand me when I counsel
you to do right."
How
long he continued to officiate in the
parish church cannot be ascertained. No records of the
parish pertaining to the church are to be found, even
after diligent inquisition made. The proceedings of the vestry of South
Farnham, in
relation to the work of processioners who were appointed by the vestry
under authority and by direction of the court of Essex, have been found;
but they only show who were the ministers and who the vestrymen of the
parish at each meeting for that business. The first
meeting was held in 1739, when the Rev. William Philips was present.
Nothing but the name of this person can be gathered from this or any
other source. He is mentioned as being present at subsequent meetings up
to 1744.
An interval of eight years
occurs, and the Rev. Alexander Cruden appears in 1752 and continues
until 1773. There is no one living in the
parish who can remember any thing of Mr. Cruden. Vague
tradition represents him as having been a fine preacher in his day.
Nothing is known as to his piety. He was a native of Aberdeen, Scotland,
as is believed, and returned to that country during the Revolutionary
War. He must have relinquished his charge two years before the war
commenced. There was no minister in the
parish from that time till 1792, when the Rev. Andrew Syme,
of Glasgow, Scotland, came to the village of Tappahannock as tutor in
the family of Dr. John Brockenbrough, and preached in the churches of
South
Farnham. He received a small salary raised by voluntary
contribution. What were the fruits of his ministerial work:
whether the scattered sheep were collected and their drooping spirits
revived, or the tide of infidelity which was then rising and afterward
spread over this region was stayed by his labours, does not appear.
Being the first minister after the Revolution, he doubtless had many
difficulties to contend with, and his usefulness must have been lessened
by his school. He removed from Essex to Petersburg in 1794. More than
twenty years elapsed before there were again any regular services in the
parish. The Rev. Mr. Mathews, of St. Anne's
parish, Essex, the
Rev. Mr. Carter, of Drysdale
parish, King and Queen county, and the Rev. Mr. Krew, of
Middlesex county, officiated in South
Farnham for the rites of baptism, marriage, and burial,
when sent for by the few remaining followers of the Episcopal Church.
When regular services were ngain resumed, it was under the ministry of
the Rev. John Reynolds, in 1822, who came to this country from England a
Wesleyan Methodist and afterward entered the ministry of the Episcopal
Church. He was called by the two parishes of Essex united. The parishes
continued so under the ministry of the Rev. J. P. McGuirc, who was
called to the rectorship of St. Anne's and South
Farnham parishes in 1825. When he resigned, in 1852, the
parishes were each able to support its own minister. During the dreary
interval in 'the history of the Church in South
Farnham parish
referred to, the influence of the Church had waned until it seemed
almost lost. That it should be revived, humanly viewed, seemed more
improbable than that it should become extinct. It was "the Lord's doing,
and it is marvellous in our eyes." The few remaining friends were now
without minister or temple. Both churches in the
parish had been destroyed,—one being pulled flown, the
other burned. The feeling of hostility to the Church engendered by the
establishment under the Colonial Government, and transmitted from
generation to generation, was greatly increased in this vicinity by the
imprisonment of some of the Dissenting ministers, —a proceeding which
was unjustly identified with the Episcopal Church. This feeling, at its
height when the influence of the Church was at the lowest, joined with
the stronger feeling of rapacity, led, as may be supposed, to wholesale
plunder of the churches and church-property. The destruction in this
parish has been complete. Nothing is to be found but the
durable materials of which the buildings were made. The bricks may be
recognised where seen ; but they are nowhere found except in other
buildings. The flagstones, too, from the aisles, may be seen in walks
and in hearths; but not a whole brick, much less one upon another, nor a
piece of timber, is to be seen where the temples of the living God
stood. The monuments of the dead were not even spared in the general
depredation. These were dragged from their resting-places and made into
grindstones, and may still be identified by parts of the original
inscriptions.
As
mentioned, no vestry-book is to be found belonging to the
parish, no Bible, Prayer Book, font, nor Communion-table;
and the strange fact can only be accounted for by supposing that they
shared one common ruin with the churches.
One
of these buildings was preserved from destruction by a worthy old
gentleman who is said to have watched, with his servants, night after
night, to protect the house of God. When
he died, the work of destruction went on, nor ceased till nothing was
left to tempt the cupidity of the plunderers. The other was spared, to
meet, if possible, a worse fate. The bricks and nails were the most
tempting materials in this house; and, as the readiest way to obtain
these was to fire the building, this was done accordingly. But the first
attempt to burn it was unsuccessful ; the fire, after burning for a
time, went out of itself. No one of sensibility could see this house of
God as it then stood— charred and blackened by fire, hacked by axes, and
otherwise injured by Vandal hands — and not have his feelings deeply
moved. But this condition did not suffice the spirit that was bent on
its destruction. It stood a short time longer, was again fired, and
burned to the ground. It had been a noble structure of the kind, must
have been one of the oldest Colonial churches, and, until within a few
years of its destruction, had much of venerable grandeur in its
appearance. Having, up to the time of its destruction, so far withstood
the influence of three natural elements, and a still worse and more
cruel in the bosom of man, with no guardians left but the venerable oaks
which had watched over it in better days, and were still stretching out
their arms toward it as if to afford help in its fallen state, it was an
object of peculiar interest. Few indeed must have been the friends then
to ask, "Who saw this house in its first glory, and how do ye see it
now?" or they had not had so soon to take up the lamentation, " Our holy
and our beautiful house, where our fathers praised thee, is burned up
with fire, and all our pleasant things are laid waste." But there was "a
remnant, according to the election of grace," who
'i
sighed for the abominations" they could not prevent, mourned over the
desolations of Zion, " who took pleasure in her stones, and favoured the
dust thereof." They were as the " two or three berries on the top of the
uppermost bough" left after the vintage. But they were "mothers in
Israel," and nourished a seed for the future Church. The glebe belonging
to the
parish,
together with the plate belonging to both churches, was sold, and the
fund accruing invested for the support of the
parish
poor. The fund yields about one thousand dollars per annum. The plate
was massive, and sold, at a sacrifice, for some three hundred or four
hundred dollars.
The
glebe was a donation from Rev. Lewis Latane, the first minister of the
parish. Had this plea been urged, after proper steps to
establish it,—as might have been done in the bar of the sale,—it had no
doubt been prevented. The following are th«
names of persons who constituted the vestry of South
Farnham parish
from 1739 to 1779:—
"
Hon. Johu Robinson, Captain Nicholas Smith, William Roane, Mr. William
Coviugton, Isaac Scandrith, John Vass, Captain William Danger- field,
Alexander Parker, Abraham Montague, James Reynolds, Captain Francis
Smith, Mr. Henry Young, James Webb, John Clements, John Upshaw, Henry
Vass, James Mills, William Montague, William Young, Thomas Roane, Samuel
Peachy, .V'crriwether Smith, Archibald Ritchie, John Richards, James
Campbell, William Smith, James Edmonson, Newman Brockunbrough, John
Beal, John Ediuon*oD.
''
The Rev. Lewis Latane fled from France to England after the revocation
of the Edict of Nantes, in October, 1685, and remained there until the
year 1700. He was ordained Deacon, September 22, and Priest, Oc- t'ber
18, of that year; reached Virginia, March 5, 1701, and took charge of
the
parish of Soutii
Farnham, April 5 of that year. He was married once before
he came to this country, and twice afterward. His third wi;e, of whom
alone any thing is known, was Miss Mary Dean, a relative and protege of
Mr. William Beverley, of Blandfield, in Essex county, and 01 the
adjoining
parish of St.
Anne's. Mr. Latane died in 1732, leaving a widow, and one sou named
John, and five daughters. In his will we have the following
characteristic trait of him:—' My will is, that whatsoever I am justly
indebted to any person be duly paid by my executor; aud whereas Mrs.
Phurbe Kater, in her last will and testament, disposed of such things to
my daughters C-, P., and 8., as were not in her power to give, my will
is that none of my said daughters shall have any of the said legacies
paid them. But, if any of them shall be so refractory as to insist on
having any of the said legacies paid them, then I give to each of my
said daughters twelvepence, iu full of all the legacies hereafter iu
this my will to them given aud bequeathed.' "
Faithfully have the descendants of this upright and conscientious man
followed the example of his integrity. Perhaps there is no instance to
be found in Virginia, where a whole family have been more remarkable for
truth and fidelity in all their dealings and character. John, his only
surviving son, married a Miss Mary Allen. William, his only
surviving son, married a Miss Ann Waring, leaving a large number of sons
and daughters. His daughter Lucy, third in descent from Mr. Latane,
married Mr. Payne Waring, of Essex, so well known as the zealous and
liberal friend of the Church in that county and in the diocese, and
father of the present Mrs. Richard Baylor. His son Henry, now seventy-
three years of age, has several children who are members of the Church,
one of whom is preparing for the ministry. His daughter Mary married Mr.
John Temple, one of whose sons is the minister of Old South
Farnham parish at this time, and one of whom died at the
University in the year 1829, a model of piety and all excellence. A
brief tribute is due to his memory. In the year 1829,
a most pestilential and fatal disease broke out in the village of
Charlottesville and at the University. Nine of the students in the
latter fell victims to it, and among them young Temple. Being invited by
the authorities of the University to improve that most afflictive
dispensation, I prepared and delivered a discourse, which was published.
From it I extract the concluding sentences, which will show in what high
esteem young Temple was held:—
" Is
there upon earth a sight so interesting as that of a young man, at a
seat of learning, in the midst of temptation, surrounded by other youths
of widely-differing sentiments, yet steadily holding on 'the even tenor
of his way.' resisting pleasure, avoiding evil communication, acting
from religious principle, and not ashamed to call himself by the name
and seal himself with the seal of Christ? Have you seen none such, my
young hearers ? Amidst all your voung associates, was there not one who
loved his Saviour, one whom you all loved, all esteemed, whom you could
not but love and esteem, and who was a witness to the truth of that
which I have spoken to-day ?
" Was
young Temple less beloved by you all because young Temple was a
Christian, because a portion of his Sabbaths was spent in teaching the
young and ignorant, because the Bible was his daily study ? And, when
death was sent to summon him away, was he less happy? Which one of you
present, now in your own mind hostile to religion and in your conduct
furthest removed from it, but would, if called to die, rather be as
young Temple was, than as you now are ?"
The
following documents explain themselves:—
"At a
Council held at the Capitol, the 23d day of January, 1716, present the
Governor and Council.
" On
reading at this Board a
representation from Mr. Commissary Blair, setting forth
that the vestry of South
Farnham parish, in Essex county, have taken upon them to
suspend Mr. Lewis Latane, their minister, from the exercise of his
ministerial office, without any previous accusation or conviction of any
crime ; and that the said vestry have also prohibited the performance of
divine service in the said
parish, by causing the church- doors to be shut, and
praying the consideration of this therein, and the orderof the vestry
for suspending Mr. Latane being also read, it is the unanimous opinion
of this Board that the said vestry have no powcT to turn out their
minister in the manner they have done; and, therefore, it is ordered
that the churchwardens cause the doors of the church to be opened, and
that the said Mr. Latane be permitted to exercise his ministerial
functions therein, until he be legally tried and convicted of such crime
as renders him unworthy to be continued, for which there are proper
judicatures to which the said vestry may apply, if they have any thing
to charge him with. And it is further resolved, that in case the said
vestry shall refuse to pay their minister, in the mean time, his salary
due by law, that propei measures be taken for obliging them to do him
justice.
"(Copied.) Wm. Robertson,
Clerk 'f Council"
Letter of Governor Spottsicood to the Churchwardens and Vestry of South
Farnham Parish in Essex.
"
Williamsbuho, December 17th, 1716.
"gentlemen :—I'm not a
little surprised at the sight of an order of yours, wherein you take
upon you to suspend from his office a clergyman who, for near sixteen
years, has served as your minister, and that without assigning any
manner of reasoo for your so doing. I look upon it that the British
subjects in these Plantations ought to conform to the Constitution of
their mother-country in all cases whereiu the laws of the several
Colonies have not otherwise decided; and, as no vestry in England ever
pretended to set themselves up as judges over their ministers, so I know
no law of this country that has given such authority to the vestry here.
If a clergyman transgresses against the canons of the Church, he is to
be tried before a proper judicature; and though in this country there be
no Bishops to apply to, yet there is the substitute of the Bishop, who
is your diocesan, and who can take cognizance of the offences of the
clergy; and I cannot believe there is any vestry here so ignorant but to
know that the Governor, for the time-being, has the honour to be
intrusted with the power of collating to all benefits, and ought, in
reason, to be made acquainted with the crime which unqualifies a
clergyman from holding a benefice of which he is once legally possessed.
In case of the misbehaviour of your minister, you may be his accusers,
but in no case hia judges; but much less are you empowered to turn him
out without showing any cause. But your churchwardens, ordering the
church to be shut, up, and thereby taking upon them to lay the
parish under an interdict, is such an exorbitant act of
power, that even the Pope of Rome never pretended to a greater; and if
your churchwardens persist in it, they will find themselves involved in
greater troubles thau they are aware of.
" By
the small number of vestrymen present at the making the late order, and
the dissent of several that were, I apprehend the turning out of Mr.
Latane, and what has followed on it since, to be the effect of some
sudden heat, and therefore I am willing to believe that, upon cooler
deliberation in a full vestry, you will think fit to reverse that order,
and give your minister the opportunity of a fair trial, if you have any
thing to accuse him of, which is what every subject ought to have before
he is condemned. But if, contrary to my expectations, you persist in
that unwarrantable way you have begun, I recommend to your inquiry what
success a vestry who took upon them the like power met with at Kichotan,
(Hampton) But I hope, without obliging me to exert that authority his
Majesty has intrusted me with, in this case you will rather choose to be
reconciled to your minister, which will be more for the quiet of your
parish, and much more obliging to,
"Gentlemen, your most humble servant,
A.
Spottswood."
A GUIDE TO THE
Joseph Sawin Ewing, Papers, 1794-1965 (bulk 1950-1965)

The Library of Virginia
800 E. Broad Street
Richmond, Virginia
www.lva.virginia.gov/
Processed by: Renee Savits
Date completed: May 4, 2001
Personal Papers Collection, Accession # 31871
Extent: 4.05 cubic feet; 9 boxes; box numbers 1-9
ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION
Provenance:
Gift of John MacDonald Ewing, 1208 Morningside Lane, Alexandria,
Virginia, 28 July 1983.
Restrictions:
None
Preferred citation:
Joseph Sawin Ewing, Papers, 1794-1965 (bulk 1950-1965). Accession 31871.
Personal Papers Collection, The Library of Virginia, Richmond, VA 23219.
Separations:
One hundred forty one maps were transferred to the Map Collection. These
include primarily U.S.G.S. topographic quadrangles and facsimiles of
some historical maps. A list of the maps is contained at the end of the
container list.
BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH
The Reverend Joseph Sawin Ewing (1899-1965) was born in Illinois and
spent a great part of his life in the midwest and west, serving churches
in Oregon, South Dakota, and Oklahoma. A 1922 graduate of the Virginia
Theological Seminary, he returned to Virginia in 1950 as rector of South
Farnham Parish, Essex County, Virginia. Residing in Tappahannock, he was
active in local historical societies and served as president of the
Essex County Historical Society in the early 1960s. He became interested
in the history of local Indian tribes and early colonial churches, doing
research and field work in both areas, locating early sites through
records, maps, and local people. He published articles in Northern
Neck of Virginia Historical Magazine (1963) and Virginia Magazine
of History and Biography (1965).
SCOPE AND CONTENT NOTE
These papers consist of research notes, correspondence, printed items,
and published articles documenting Ewing's interests in genealogy and
local history of the Old Rappahannock County (Va.) area. The county
existed from 1656 to 1692 and covered present day Essex and Richmond
counties and parts of other adjoining counties. There are transcripts of
court records, correspondence, information on old homes, towns,
families, and villages of Old Rappahannock County, extracts from
published sources, and other historical information. Ewing also included
King and Queen, King George, Lancaster, Middlesex, New Kent, and
Westmoreland counties in his researches.
The papers are divided into eight series including, Colonial Church,
Correspondence, Indians, Notes, Pioneer Settlements, Research notes for
published articles, Rosegill, and Subject files. Ewing's original folder
titles have been maintained, along with the original series division.
Ewing's method of titling folders appears to have been one of casual
notations of content, rather than precise information on materials
within the folders. Therefore crosschecking of folders and series is
necessary to yield all pertinent information.
SERIES DESCRIPTIONS
Series I: Colonial Church (1794-1961)
This series includes notes, maps, outlines, plats, and published
materials used in Ewing's 1961 lecture series on the colonial church in
Virginia. Ewing lectured at the Grace Episcopal Church (Alexandria, Va.)
and the Abingdon Men's Club (Abingdon, Va.), among other places.
Included are notes on Lancaster Parish (Middlesex County, Virginia),
South Farnham Parish (Essex County, Virginia), and Upper Piscataway
Parish (Old Rappahannock County, Virginia).
Series II: Correspondence (1952-1965)
This series includes correspondence from genealogists researching
families in Essex, King and Queen, King George, Lancaster, Middlesex,
New Kent, Richmond, and Westmoreland counties, Virginia. Correspondents
include Stephen F. Bayne Jr., Laurance S. Brigham, Lawrence L. Brown,
George MacLaren Brydon, George H.S. King, Howard McCord, George
Carrington Mason, and Peter Quennel.
Series III: Indians (1950-1964)
This series includes correspondence, clippings, maps, notes, and
publications Ewing gathered on the Rappahannock Indians. Includes copy
of the publication "Indian Sites below the falls of the Rappahannock,
Virginia," by David Bushnell, correspondence, newsletters, and quarterly
bulletins from the Archeological Society of Virginia, and a paper
written by Joseph Ewing, Margaret Ewing, and Helen Rountree entitled,
"Indian towns in Virginia's Rappahannock River Valley, 1608-1800." Also
includes information on the Mattaponi Indians.
Series IV: Notes
This series contains miscellaneous notes regarding Essex and Richmond
counties, Virginia. The folders are labeled according to the source of
the information. Folder titles include Essex County land tax lists and
order books, Mutual Assurance Society of Virginia records, chancery
cases, Colonial Records Project, and the Webb family papers.
Series V: Pioneer settlements
This series includes notes on the neighborhoods resulting from the
Lancaster County court order of 6 August 1653, which created
Rappahannock County and appointed ten commissioners to oversee the local
muster. The order described the muster limits, which included the home
plantation of each commissioner. These neighborhoods are numbered by
Ewing and listed geographically from the lower end of the north side of
the Rappahannock River to the upper section, and from the lower end of
the south side of the river to the upper section. Ewing's folder titles
have been maintained as well as the original arrangement of the folders
after determining the subject's location on the north or south side of
the Rappahannock River. Materials within these folders contain general
information on land transfers and ownership of a particular piece of
land.
Series VI: Research notes for published articles (1963-1965)
This series includes drafts and notes from articles written by Ewing,
including "The First Justices in the Rappahannock River and the
Formation of Rappahannock County," published in 1963 in the Northern
Neck of Virginia Historical Magazine (Vol. 13, December 1963, pp.
1182-1194) and "The Correspondence of Archibald McCall and George
McCall," published in 1965 in Virginia Magazine of History and
Biography (Vol. 73, July and October 1965, pp. 312-353, 425-454).
Included are notes, footnotes, drafts, and final drafts.
Series VII: Rosegill
This series includes notes, clippings, published materials, maps, and an
outline for a paper about the Wormley family plantation of Rosegill in
Middlesex County, Virginia.
Series VIII: Subject files
This series contains clippings, notes, maps, and correspondence on a
variety of subjects including Bacon's Rebellion, biographies on Henry
Fleet and George Washington, highway markers in Essex County, mills,
naval officers and collectors of revenue in the rivers, roads and
ferries, swamps and creeks, and tobacco.
CONTAINER LIST
|
Box |
Folder |
Contents |
| |
|
Series I. Colonial Church |
|
1 |
1 |
Church road and Church road swamp |
| |
2 |
Church sites |
| |
3 |
Glebes and poor house tracts |
| |
4 |
Lancaster Parish (Middlesex County, Va.) |
| |
5 |
Leedstown Church and Occupatia Church |
| |
6 |
Lecture #1, 1961 |
| |
7 |
Lecture #2, 1961 |
| |
8 |
Lecture #3, 1961 |
| |
9 |
Lecture #4, 1961 |
| |
10 |
Lecture #5, 1961 |
| |
11 |
Lecture #6, 1961 |
| |
12 |
Letter, Andrew Syme to William Latane, 1794 |
| |
13 |
Miscellaneous notes |
| |
14 |
Reading notes |
| |
15 |
South Farnham Parish (Essex County, Va.) |
| |
16 |
South Farnham Parish (Essex County, Va.) |
| |
17 |
South Farnham Parish (Essex County, Va.) |
| |
18 |
South Farnham Parish (Essex County, Va.) |
| |
19 |
South Farnham Parish (Essex County, Va.) |
| |
20 |
Talks on colonial church |
| |
21 |
Upper Piscataway church sites |
| |
|
Series II. Correspondence
|
| |
22 |
Bayne, Stephen, 1959 |
| |
23 |
Essex County families, 1955-1964 |
| |
24 |
Essex County families, 1962-1963 |
| |
25 |
Mason, George, 1952-1962 |
| |
26 |
Matthews family, 1961 |
| |
27 |
Rosier family, 1961-1965 |
|
2 |
1 |
Smith family, 1957-1963 |
| |
|
Series III. Indians
|
| |
2 |
Archaeological Society of Virginia, 1950-1964 |
| |
3 |
David Bushnell's book |
| |
4 |
Correspondence, 1953-1964 |
| |
5 |
"Indian towns in the Virginia Rappahannock River Valley,
1608-1800" |
| |
6 |
Mattoponi Indian town |
| |
7 |
Miscellaneous notes |
| |
8 |
Movement of Indians |
| |
9 |
Piscataway |
| |
10 |
Rappahannock River tribes and towns |
| |
|
Series IV. Notes
|
| |
11 |
Acts establishing towns and ports |
| |
12 |
Chancery boxes |
| |
13 |
Colonial period |
| |
14 |
Colonial parish and county records |
| |
15 |
Colonial Records project |
| |
16 |
Essex County land tax list |
| |
17 |
Essex County order books |
| |
18 |
Essex County order books |
| |
19 |
Essex County processioners book |
| |
20 |
Fleet, Beverly |
| |
21 |
Harrison, Fairfax |
| |
22 |
Hening, William |
|
3 |
1 |
Land records, miscellaneous |
| |
2 |
Mutual Assurance Society of Virginia |
| |
3 |
Richmond County, Virginia |
| |
4 |
School, George |
| |
5 |
Sweeney's wills |
| |
6 |
Webb family papers |
| |
7 |
Wright's notes |
| |
8 |
Miscellaneous notes |
| |
9 |
Miscellaneous notes |
| |
10 |
Miscellaneous notes |
| |
11 |
Needs investigation |
| |
12 |
To be checked |
| |
|
Series V. Pioneer Settlements
|
| |
|
Subseries 1. General
|
| |
13 |
Source material |
| |
14 |
I. North Side, Corotoman River mouth to mouth of Rappahannock
River/Christ Church area |
| |
15 |
II. North Side, Upper side Corotoman River to Thomas Brice's
|
| |
16 |
III. North Side, Thomas Brice's north to county line
|
| |
17 |
IV. North Side, County line/Farnham Creek to upper side Totusky
Creek |
| |
18 |
V. North Side, Catgut to Pepetick Creek, Leedstown to Bray's
Church |
| |
19 |
VI. North Side, Leedstown to head of river |
| |
20 |
I. South Side, Christ Church/Saluda to mouth/Old Piankatank
Point |
| |
21 |
II. South Side, South of LaGrange creek to Saluda and Christ
Church |
| |
22 |
III. South Side, North side of LaGrange creek to county line
|
| |
23 |
IV. South Side, North from county line including Puscoticion
creek |
| |
24 |
IVa. South Side, Purcatacon/Piscataway |
| |
25 |
V. South Side, North side of Piscataway |
| |
26 |
Va. South Side, Pioneers on Hoskins |
| |
27 |
VI. South Side, Occupason creek to head of river |
| |
|
Subseries 2. North Side
|
|
4 |
1 |
Downman, Deschamps, Sydnor, Grittith, Davis, Woolard, Stonum
|
| |
2 |
Woolard, Smith |
| |
3 |
Peacock's, Mar's Hill, Fauntleroy, Northern, B. McCarty, Swan
|
| |
4 |
Belle Mount, Belfields, Mitchell's |
| |
5 |
Peachy |
| |
6 |
Baileys, Downman family |
| |
7 |
John Davis, upper part of Luke Milner's, Mark Milner to Thomas
Hammond, Le Roy Dobyns, George Davis |
| |
8 |
Hodgkin, Hayden, Travers |
| |
9 |
Fauntleroy, Farnham Creek patents, Farnham plantation
|
| |
10 |
Farnham, maps and plats |
| |
11 |
Downman |
| |
12 |
Downman Hall |
| |
13 |
Farnham River front |
| |
14 |
Windsor, Farnham Glebe, North Farnham Church |
| |
15 |
Durrettsville, Miskill, Calvary M.E. Church |
| |
16 |
Cedar Grove, Nicholas Flood |
| |
17 |
Farnham Creek notes |
| |
18 |
Jones, Edward |
| |
19 |
Edgehill and Bowerhill |
| |
20 |
Farnham's Hall, George Payne, Chelsea |
| |
21 |
Farnham house tract |
| |
22 |
Woodford |
| |
23 |
Cabinete Hall, Hornsby Manor |
| |
24 |
Peacock's quarter |
| |
25 |
Appleby's |
| |
26 |
Robert Hopkins and Henry Fleets patents, north side of
Rappahannock, Fleet's, Catpoint's creek |
| |
27 |
Fauntleroy and William Lloyd, Stonehouse, Mangorite, Naylors,
Rappahannock creek |
| |
28 |
William Underwood, James Williamson, Robert Tomlin, Meader's,
John Sherlock |
| |
29 |
John Hull, forks of the Tutsky, Richmond Hill, Garland's mill
pond, Indian field, Rich Neck, Charles B. Carter's estate
|
| |
|
Subseries 3. South Side
|
|
5 |
1 |
Smith, Nicholas |
| |
2 |
Webb family |
| |
3 |
Tappahannock Masonic Lodge |
| |
4 |
Hobb's Hole |
| |
5 |
Essex County history talk |
| |
6 |
Peachy, William |
| |
7 |
Back of Miles End, from river, below Piscataway |
| |
8 |
Corbin Hill |
| |
9 |
Catch Penny |
| |
10 |
Payne and Tony Smith's land |
| |
11 |
South Hill |
| |
12 |
Waterview and Belleview, young, Gatewood, Tuscararora, Waring
|
| |
13 |
John Robinson family |
| |
14 |
Toby Smith, Ashland, Paradise, Hill Park, Peachy's, Oake, Joshua
Fry, Browne's |
| |
15 |
Baughan, James |
| |
16 |
Essex County, Virginia |
| |
17 |
Paul's Cross roads, north side of Old Mill Road, Woods, Banks,
Conners |
| |
18 |
Paul's Cross Roads, Gordons, south side of Old Mill Road
|
| |
19 |
Mussel creek, up and including New Glasgow, Rich Neck, Deep
Landing, Sandy Landing |
| |
20 |
Wood, Thomas |
| |
21 |
Western branch, later deeds, Piscataway, south side |
| |
22 |
Dunns Mill, Matthews bridge |
| |
23 |
Middle branch of Piscataway |
| |
24 |
Covington, Jones, Claiborne, Minor |
| |
25 |
Jones Point, Rice Jones estate, Montagues, Mount Prospect, Rose
Hill, Mount Comfort, Layton's, below glebe |
| |
26 |
People, plantations, and land, Essex and King and Queen,
Miller's Tavern, to St. Paul's, to Haile's bridge |
Last modified: August 28, 2009
SMITH, Meriwether, (1730
- 1790)SMITH, Meriwether,
a Delegate from Virginia; born at “Bathurst,” near Dunnsville,
Essex County, Va., in 1730; completed preparatory studies; was a signer
of the Westmoreland Association in 1766; member of Essex Committee on
Safety in 1774; member of the House of Burgesses in 1774 and 1775;
delegate to the Revolutionary conventions of 1775 and 1776; member of
the state house of delegates 1776-1778; member of the Continental
Congress 1778-1779 and 1781; again a member of the state house of
delegates in 1781, 1782, 1785, and 1788; delegate to the state
ratification convention in 1788; died at
“Marigold,” near Ozeana, Essex County,
Va., January 25, 1790; interment on his estate at “Bathurst,”
near Dunnsville, Essex County, Va.
SOURCE: http://bioguide.congress.gov/scripts/biodisplay.pl?index=S000593
President Calvin Coolidge
Address at the College of William and Mary,
Williamsburg, Va.
May 15, 1926
It was on the 6th of May, 1776, that there
assembled at Williamsburg a convention which was to become historic. It
was presided over by Edmund Pendleton, who had opposed the stamp act
resolutions of Patrick Henry, but 11 years and the wanton cruelty of the
royal governor had made a great change in the public opinion of the
Colony and he had become a loyal supporter of independence. He now
joined with Patrick Henry and Meriwether Smith
in drafting resolutions to be proposed by Thomas Nelson, which refer to
our country as "America," and after setting out the grievances that it
had endured and "appealing to the Searcher of Hearts for the sincerity
of former declarations" and a discussion in which Mason and Madison, to
be known to future fame, took part, on the 15th of May, 1776, it
SOURCE:
http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=397; Retrieved 17
August 2009
____________________________________________________________
References: "The Meriwethers and Their Connections",
by Nelson Heath Meriwether, "Albemarle County in Virginia" by Rev. Edgar
Woods, "Early Virginia Families Along the James River Volume III"
Compiled by Louise Pledge Heath Foley, "Virginia Land Records" Indexed
by Gary Parks Isle of Wight County Deeds and Other Records Deeds,
Orders, etc, "Surry County, Virginia Court Records 1652-1663 Book I"
Weynette Parks Hawn, "Surry County, Virginia Court Records 1664-1671
Book II" Weynette Parks Hawn, "Surry County Virginia Court Records
1672-1682" Book III Weynette Parks Hawn, "Surry County Records, Surry
County, Virginia 1652-1684 Book II" by Eliza Timberlake Davis, "Wills
and Administrations of Surry County, Virginia 1671-1750" Compiled by
Eliza Timberlake Davis, " Essex County,
Virginia Deeds and Wills No. 13 1707-1711" compiled by John
Frederick Dorman, "Minutes of the Council and General Court of Colonial
Virginia" 2nd Edition Edited by H. R. NcIlwaine, and "Virginia Colonial
Abstracts" by Beverley Fleet Vol II, "Colonial Surry" by John B. Boddie.
- Children of Nicholas Meriwether and Elizabeth Woodhouse
- 1. Jane Meriwether, b 1666 m 1)Maj. William Browne and 2) Robert
Lewis
- 2. NICHOLAS MERIWETHER II, b 26 Oct 1667, James City, Surry Co,
VA d 05 Nov 1744 Goochland, Albemarle Co, VA
- 3. Francis Meriwether, b ca 1667-72 d
ca 1712-13 Essex Co, VA m Mary Bathurst
- 4. William Meriwether, b ca 1667-1673 d bef 21 Apr 1695 m
Elizabeth Clements
- 5. Thomas Meriwether, b 1669 d between 7 Jan-10 Feb 1708-09
Essex Co, Va m 1) unknown and 2) Susannah Skelton
- 6. David Meriwether, b 1669
- 7. Elizabeth Meriwether, b 1670
http://www.geocities.com/elaineclow/surname/meriwether.html#1
 |